|WARNING| pw133792 [RFC] eal: RFC to refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/133792

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'upto' may be misspelled - perhaps 'up to'?
#62: 
b) rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() can consume upto 300-350 ms for

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'appplications' may be misspelled - perhaps 'applications'?
#67: 
This patch provides an optimization using pthreads that appplications

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#139: FILE: lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c:1304:
+	return 0;	//return Success if control reaches here

ERROR:SPACING: spaces required around that '>=' (ctx:VxV)
#147: FILE: lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c:1312:
+	if (fctret>=0)
 	          ^

WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Rahul Gupta <rahulgupt at microsoft.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Rahul Gupta <rahulgupt at linux.microsoft.com>'

total: 2 errors, 3 warnings, 55 lines checked
ERROR: symbol rte_eal_init_setup is added in the DPDK_20.0 section, but is expected to be added in the EXPERIMENTAL section of the version map
ERROR: symbol rte_probe_and_ioctl is added in the DPDK_20.0 section, but is expected to be added in the EXPERIMENTAL section of the version map