|WARNING| pw135991 [PATCH v3] eal: refactor rte_eal_init into sub-functions
checkpatch at dpdk.org
checkpatch at dpdk.org
Fri Jan 19 17:58:36 CET 2024
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/135991
_coding style issues_
Must be a reply to the first patch (--in-reply-to).
WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'dont' may be misspelled - perhaps 'don't'?
#131: FILE: app/test-pmd/testpmd.c:4571:
+ * if testpmd application dont want to know progress/status of
WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'MASTER' may be misspelled - perhaps 'PRIMARY'?
#154: FILE: lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h:117:
+ * Its called from rte_eal_init() on MASTER lcore only and must NOT be directly
ERROR:MISSING_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
total: 1 errors, 2 warnings, 171 lines checked
Warning in lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h:
Using compiler attribute directly
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
Please only put __rte_experimental tags in headers (b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c)
Please only put __rte_experimental tags in headers (b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c)
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
Please only put __rte_experimental tags in headers (b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c)
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
Please only put __rte_experimental tags in headers (b/lib/eal/linux/eal.c)
__rte_experimental must appear alone on the line immediately preceding the return type of a function.
More information about the test-report
mailing list