|WARNING| pw161347 [PATCH v2 3/3] test/eal_flags: remove PCI probing for recursive calls

[checkpatch at dpdk.org]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/161347

_coding style issues_


WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#96: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:934:
+	const char *argv6[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci, "-m", DEFAULT_MEM_SIZE,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#181: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1231:
+	const char *argv1[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci, "-m",

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#186: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1235:
+	const char *argv2[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci, "-m",

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#192: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1240:
+	const char *argv3[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci, "-m",

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#198: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1245:
+	const char *argv4[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci, "-m",

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#234: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1522:
+	const char *argv1[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#240: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1527:
+	const char *argv2[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#246: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1532:
+	const char *argv3[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#252: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1537:
+	const char *argv4[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#258: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1542:
+	const char *argv5[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#264: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1547:
+	const char *argv6[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#269: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1551:
+	const char *argv7[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#275: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1556:
+	const char *argv8[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#284: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1574:
+	const char *argv9[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: char * array declaration might be better as static const
#290: FILE: app/test/test_eal_flags.c:1579:
+	const char *argv10[] = {prgname, eal_debug_logs, no_pci,

total: 0 errors, 15 warnings, 205 lines checked