|SUCCESS| net/bnxt: fix TruFlow CPM pool-use list insertion

[dpdklab at iol.unh.edu]

Test-Label: ai-code-review
Test-Status: SUCCESS
https://dpdk.org/patch/170564

_AI Code Review_

=== Patch Review: series.patch (via Claude) ===
Review date: 2026-10-05

# DPDK Patch Review

## Overview
The patch file appears to be empty or was not successfully included in your message. I don't see any actual patch content to review.

## What I Expected to See
A valid DPDK patch should contain:
- Commit message (subject, body, sign-off tags)
- Diff hunks showing changes to source files
- File paths (e.g., `--- a/lib/eal/...`, `+++ b/lib/eal/...`)
- Added/removed/modified lines with `+`, `-`, or context lines

## Next Steps
Please provide the patch content in one of these ways:

1. **Paste the patch directly** - Include the full output of `git format-patch` or `git diff`
2. **Upload the file** - If the patch is large, ensure the file is properly attached
3. **Verify the file** - Check that `series.patch` contains actual patch content and isn't empty

Example of expected format:
```
>From abc123... Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Author Name <email at example.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 12:00:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] example: add new feature

Detailed commit message explaining the change.

Signed-off-by: Author Name <email at example.com>
---
 lib/eal/example.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/eal/example.c b/lib/eal/example.c
index 123..456 100644
--- a/lib/eal/example.c
+++ b/lib/eal/example.c
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
...
```

Once you provide the actual patch content, I'll perform a thorough review focusing on correctness bugs, coding style, API requirements, and guideline compliance as requested.