[dpdk-users] Calling timers from a library

[Archit Pandey]

Thanks for the tip!

This was what I experienced when I ran a separate function with periodic
calls to rte_timer_manage(). The code would deadlock and stop executing
after a few seconds.

Is there a way to overcome this? Perhaps by passing the core numbers into
the library?

--
Archit Pandey
Senior Year Undergraduate Student
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Institute of Technology Karnataka
Surathkal, India

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, 8:27 pm Stephen Hemminger, <stephen at networkplumber.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:37:12 +0530
> Archit Pandey <architpandeynitk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello DPDK users,
> >
> > I'm building a library for DPDK which utilizes periodically called
> > functions using the dpdk timer facility. Currently, I'm using the master
> > core on an application to call timer_manage() and run the scheduled
> timers.
> >
> > My doubt is whether its possible to call timer_manage() from inside the
> > library to run the scheduled timers. This would allow for a much more
> > streamlined design. An issue which comes to mind is that my library is
> not
> > aware of the cores it is being run on, hence I cannot use
> > rte_eal_remote_launch() for a function that calls rte_timer_manage().
> >
> > Any help on how I can do this would be greatly appreciated!
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
>
> In my experience, once you start running DPDK functions on
> non-DPDK threads lots of things can break. The DPDK threads are pinned
> to a core and therefore don't preempt each other. For non-DPDK threads
> they are not pinned; therefore a DPDK library or other code using
> rte_spinlocks can get preempted with and self-deadlock.
>