[dpdk-web] update of ecosystem page

[谈鉴锋]

+Jielong

As a developer and user of TLDK, glad to see this topic.

Recently, we have added more features into TLDK, like SACK, fixed 10+ bugs, and deployed TLDK into online applications.
From our side, we would continue to use and invest TLDK, and open source what we have in TLDK.

As you can see in our case, TLDK and DPDK can be used in cloud-native env, besides network-type application, like LB, DNS, etc.
It's a much larger deployment than the later sitting at the data center edge or telecom boxes.

In all, we'd like to see TLDK shown in this page, and more users can reference it. As for TLDK vs TLDKv2, now we
definitely use TLDKv2. Considering that TLDKv2 provides both l4p and socket interface, I personally think we can move on to TLDKv2.
Konstantin, what's your opinion?

Thanks,
Jianfeng







------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
Send Time:2020年11月9日(星期一) 19:19
To:Jill Lovato <jlovato at linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:tdelanerolle <tdelanerolle at linuxfoundation.org>; web <web at dpdk.org>; AnanyevKonstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; 谈鉴锋(浩也) <henry.tjf at antfin.com>; irene.zhang <irene.zhang at microsoft.com>; maxime.coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>; orika <orika at nvidia.com>; guyk <guyk at marvell.com>
Subject:update of ecosystem page

Hi,

I'm looking to update the ecosystem page:
https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/

In the list of projects using DPDK,
- ANS got a website: http://www.ansyun.com/
- F-Stack is missing: http://www.f-stack.org/
- TLDK is missing: https://github.com/FDio/tldk/
Should we prefer TLDKv2? https://github.com/FDio/tldk/tree/dev-next-socket
- demikernel/catnip is missing: https://github.com/demikernel/demikernel/tree/master/src/rust/catnip

In the list of device classes, we are missing:
- Regular Expression Engine
- vHost Data Path Acceleration

Thanks