[dpdk-ci] CI work status check

[Aaron Conole]

"Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang at intel.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot.
> This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my environment.
> It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be
> applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.

I guess that's probably what happened here.  The DPDK 0-day robot has
difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against.  Nothing
'wrong' here on your side.  I will look at this closer and see if I can
get it working better.

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
>> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang at intel.com>
>> Cc: ci at dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
>> 
>> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang at intel.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
>> >
>> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made
>> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem.
>> 
>> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
>> 
>>   error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
>>   error: could not build fake ancestor
>>   hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
>>   Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
>>   When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
>>   If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
>>   To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>> 
>> So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?
>> 
>> > Here is the link:
>> >
>> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking forward to your reply.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Cheng