[dpdk-ci] CI work status check

[Jiang, Cheng1]

Sure, thanks a lot.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 11:38 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang at intel.com>
> Cc: ci at dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
> <jiayu.hu at intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX <yvonnex.yang at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> 
> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang at intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> > This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my
> environment.
> > It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be
> > applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.
> 
> I guess that's probably what happened here.  The DPDK 0-day robot has
> difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against.  Nothing 'wrong'
> here on your side.  I will look at this closer and see if I can get it working
> better.
> 
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
> >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang at intel.com>
> >> Cc: ci at dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> >>
> >> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang at intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
> >> >
> >> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not
> >> > made any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a
> problem.
> >>
> >> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
> >>
> >>   error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
> >>   error: could not build fake ancestor
> >>   hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> >>   Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
> >>   When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> >>   If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> >>   To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> >>
> >> So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?
> >>
> >> > Here is the link:
> >> >
> >> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Looking forward to your reply.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Cheng