[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/ice: enable switch filter

Zhao1, Wei wei.zhao1 at intel.com
Mon Jun 17 10:23:24 CEST 2019


Hi, beilei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 1:27 PM
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/ice: enable switch filter
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qiming Yang
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 3:50 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/ice: enable switch filter
> >
> > From: wei zhao <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> >
> > The patch enables the backend of rte_flow. It transfers rte_flow_xxx
> > to device specific data structure and configures packet process
> > engine's binary classifier
> > (switch) properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ice/Makefile            |   1 +
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h        |   6 +
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 502
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.h |  28 ++
> >  drivers/net/ice/meson.build         |   3 +-
> >  5 files changed, 539 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  create mode 100644
> > drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/Makefile b/drivers/net/ice/Makefile index
> > 0e5c55e..b10d826 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/Makefile
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86), y)
> >  SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_PMD) += ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c  endif
> >
> > +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_PMD) += ice_switch_filter.c
> >  ifeq ($(findstring
> > RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_AVX2,$(CFLAGS)),RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_AVX2)
> >  	CC_AVX2_SUPPORT=1
> >  else
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h index 1385afa..67a358a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > @@ -234,6 +234,12 @@ struct ice_vsi {
> >  	bool offset_loaded;
> >  };
> >
> > +/* Struct to store flow created. */
> > +struct rte_flow {
> > +	TAILQ_ENTRY(rte_flow) node;
> > +void *rule;
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct ice_pf {
> >  	struct ice_adapter *adapter; /* The adapter this PF associate to */
> >  	struct ice_vsi *main_vsi; /* pointer to main VSI structure */ diff
> > --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e679675
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,502 @@
> > +#include <sys/queue.h>
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > +#include <stdint.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +#include <stdarg.h>
> > +
> > +#include <rte_debug.h>
> > +#include <rte_ether.h>
> > +#include <rte_ethdev_driver.h>
> > +#include <rte_log.h>
> > +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> > +#include <rte_eth_ctrl.h>
> > +#include <rte_tailq.h>
> > +#include <rte_flow_driver.h>
> > +
> > +#include "ice_logs.h"
> > +#include "base/ice_type.h"
> > +#include "ice_switch_filter.h"
> > +
> > +static int
> > +ice_parse_switch_filter(
> > +			const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > +			const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > +			struct rte_flow_error *error,
> > +			struct ice_adv_rule_info *rule_info,
> > +			struct ice_adv_lkup_elem **lkup_list,
> > +			uint16_t *lkups_num)
> > +{
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item *item = pattern;
> > +	enum rte_flow_item_type item_type;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_spec, *eth_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *ipv4_spec, *ipv4_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 *ipv6_spec, *ipv6_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_spec, *tcp_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec, *udp_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_spec, *sctp_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_nvgre  *nvgre_spec, *nvgre_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_vxlan  *vxlan_spec, *vxlan_mask;
> > +	struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list;
> > +	uint16_t i, j, t = 0;
> > +	uint16_t item_num = 0;
> > +	enum ice_sw_tunnel_type tun_type = ICE_NON_TUN;
> > +
> > +	for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
> > +		if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6 ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_SCTP ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN ||
> > +			item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_NVGRE)
> > +			item_num++;
> > +	}
> 
> I think the pattern is verified in generic flow framework, so how about
> removing the condition here?

This is not verfy, just get the number of item_num to malloc memory for list

> 
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +/* By now ice switch filter action code implement only
> > +* supports QUEUE or DROP.
> > +*/
> > +static int
> > +ice_parse_switch_action(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +				 const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> > +				 struct rte_flow_error *error,
> > +				 struct ice_adv_rule_info *rule_info) {
> > +	struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > +	struct ice_vsi *vsi = pf->main_vsi;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_action *act;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_action_queue *act_q;
> > +	uint16_t base_queue, index = 0;
> > +	uint32_t reg;
> > +
> > +	/* Check if the first non-void action is QUEUE or DROP. */
> > +	NEXT_ITEM_OF_ACTION(act, actions, index);
> > +	if (act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE &&
> > +	    act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DROP) {
> > +		rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > +				   act, "Not supported action.");
> > +		return -rte_errno;
> > +	}
> > +	reg = ICE_READ_REG(hw, PFLAN_RX_QALLOC);
> > +	if (reg & PFLAN_RX_QALLOC_VALID_M) {
> > +		base_queue = reg & PFLAN_RX_QALLOC_FIRSTQ_M;
> > +	} else {
> > +		rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> > +			RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > +			act, "Invalid queue register");
> > +		return -rte_errno;
> > +	}
> > +	if (act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE) {
> > +		act_q = act->conf;
> > +		rule_info->sw_act.fltr_act = ICE_FWD_TO_Q;
> > +		rule_info->sw_act.fwd_id.q_id = base_queue + act_q->index;
> > +		if (act_q->index >= pf->dev_data->nb_rx_queues) {
> > +			rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> > +				RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > +				act, "Invalid queue ID for"
> > +				" switch filter.");
> > +			return -rte_errno;
> > +		}
> > +	} else {
> > +		rule_info->sw_act.fltr_act = ICE_DROP_PACKET;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rule_info->sw_act.vsi_handle = vsi->idx;
> > +	rule_info->rx = 1;
> > +	rule_info->sw_act.src = vsi->idx;
> > +
> > +	/* Check if the next non-void item is END */
> > +	index++;
> > +	NEXT_ITEM_OF_ACTION(act, actions, index);
> > +	if (act->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END) {
> > +		rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > +				   act, "Not supported action.");
> > +		return -rte_errno;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> 
> How about use supported array to replace NEXT_ITEM_OF_ACTION? Just like
> pattern.

Ok, updated in v3

> 
> 
> > +
> > +static int
> > +ice_switch_rule_set(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +			struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list,
> > +			uint16_t lkups_cnt,
> > +			struct ice_adv_rule_info *rule_info,
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow)
> > +{
> > +	struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0};
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr;
> > +
> > +	if (lkups_cnt > ICE_MAX_CHAIN_WORDS) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "item number too large for rule");
> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> > +	}
> > +	if (!list) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "lookup list should not be NULL");
> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = ice_add_adv_rule(hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);
> > +
> > +	if (!ret) {
> > +		filter_ptr = rte_zmalloc("ice_switch_filter",
> > +			sizeof(struct ice_rule_query_data), 0);
> > +		if (!filter_ptr) {
> > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "failed to allocate memory");
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> > +		flow->rule = filter_ptr;
> > +		rte_memcpy(filter_ptr,
> > +			&rule_added,
> > +			sizeof(struct ice_rule_query_data));
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +ice_create_switch_filter(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +			const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > +			const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow,
> > +			struct rte_flow_error *error)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info = {0};
> > +	struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = NULL;
> > +	uint16_t lkups_num = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = ice_parse_switch_filter(pattern, actions, error,
> > +			&rule_info, &list, &lkups_num);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	ret = ice_parse_switch_action(pf, actions, error, &rule_info);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	ret = ice_switch_rule_set(pf, list, lkups_num, &rule_info, flow);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	rte_free(list);
> 
> Why allocate list is not in the function?


Because I don't know the size, just as the comment before.

> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +out:
> > +	rte_free(list);
> > +
> > +	return -rte_errno;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +ice_destroy_switch_filter(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow)
> > +{
> > +	struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr;
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added;
> > +
> > +	filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *)
> > +			flow->rule;
> > +	rte_memcpy(&rule_added, filter_ptr,
> > +		sizeof(struct ice_rule_query_data));
> > +
> > +	if (!filter_ptr) {
> > +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "no such flow"
> > +			    " create by switch filter");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> How about add struct rte_flow_error *error as the parameter, and use
> rte_flow_error_set here?

Ok, updated in v3

> 
> > +
> > +	ret = ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id(hw, &rule_added);
> > +
> > +	rte_free(filter_ptr);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +ice_free_switch_filter_rule(void *rule) {
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr;
> > +
> > +	filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *)rule;
> > +
> > +	rte_free(filter_ptr);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.h
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..957d0d1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +#ifndef _ICE_SWITCH_FILTER_H_
> > +#define _ICE_SWITCH_FILTER_H_
> > +
> > +#include "base/ice_switch.h"
> > +#include "base/ice_type.h"
> > +#include "ice_ethdev.h"
> > +
> > +#define NEXT_ITEM_OF_ACTION(act, actions, index)                        \
> > +	do {                                                            \
> > +		act = actions + index;                                  \
> > +		while (act->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VOID) {        \
> > +			index++;                                        \
> > +			act = actions + index;                          \
> > +		}                                                       \
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +int
> > +ice_create_switch_filter(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +			const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> > +			const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow,
> > +			struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +int
> > +ice_destroy_switch_filter(struct ice_pf *pf,
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow);
> > +void
> > +ice_free_switch_filter_rule(void *rule); #endif /*
> > +_ICE_SWITCH_FILTER_H_ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/meson.build b/drivers/net/ice/meson.build
> > index
> > 2bec688..8697676 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/meson.build
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/meson.build
> > @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ objs = [base_objs]
> >
> >  sources = files(
> >  	'ice_ethdev.c',
> > -	'ice_rxtx.c'
> > +	'ice_rxtx.c',
> > +	'ice_switch_filter.c'
> >  	)
> >
> >  deps += ['hash']
> > --
> > 2.9.5



More information about the dev mailing list