[dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Nov 22 09:17:00 CET 2021


On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:54 PM Dumitrescu, Cristian
<cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote:
> On a different point, we should probably tweak our autotests to differentiate between logical failures and those failures related to resources not being available, and flag the test result accordingly in the report. For example, if memory allocation fails, the test should be flagged as "Not enough resources" instead of simply "Failed". In the first case, the next step should be fixing the test setup, while in the second case the next step should be fixing the code. What do people think on this?

In such case, the test must return TEST_SKIPPED.

I did a pass for cores count / specific hw requirements, some time ago.
See https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=e0f4a0ed4237


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list