[dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures

[Liguzinski, WojciechX]

Ok, thanks Brandon for the tip :)
Let’s see if I can setup the machine with such configuration.

Cheers,
Wojciech

From: Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 6:58 PM
To: Liguzinski, WojciechX <wojciechx.liguzinski at intel.com>
Cc: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>; Ajmera, Megha <megha.ajmera at intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh at intel.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; ci at dpdk.org; Zegota, AnnaX <annax.zegota at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:48 AM Liguzinski, WojciechX <wojciechx.liguzinski at intel.com<mailto:wojciechx.liguzinski at intel.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Thanks Lincoln, I will also have a try with such script.

Cheers,
Wojciech

Hello Wojciech,

I also recommend trying to run the test with around 4GB of RAM and 2GB of hugepages to see if it fails. That is roughly the number of resources we have per machine that is completely dedicated to unit tests. The amount of RAM available can sometimes increase depending on how many jobs are running per machine, but 4GB is the lowest it can go for the unit test job.

Thanks,
Brandon



--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>
www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20211130/ad4481ea/attachment.htm>