[PATCH v1 1/2] net/e1000: better clock synchronization workaround
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Mon Jun 9 18:23:10 CEST 2025
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:16:41 +0100
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote:
> + ret_val = hw->phy.ops.write_reg_locked(hw, E1000_PHY_TIMEOUTS_REG,
> + phy_timeout);
> +
> + return ret_val;
Why use temporary value (ret_val) and not just a return statement?
return hw->phy.ops.write_reg_locked(hw, E1000_PHY_TIMEOUTS_REG, phy_timeout);
More information about the dev
mailing list