[RFC 0/3] net/ntnic: prefix global symbols
Serhii Iliushyk
sil-plv at napatech.com
Mon Sep 29 17:59:36 CEST 2025
Hi!
The patch series looks good.
Only one thought from my side is about consistency between prefixes for global symbols for variables and functions.
For functions, we use the prefix "nthw_*"; however, the patch series uses the prefix "ntnic_" for global variables.
Will it be better to keep the same prefix for functions and variables?
If there is no strict rule, we may keep "ntnic_".
On 26.09.2025, 19:25, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen at networkplumber.org> wrote:
The ntnic driver in next-net is not consitent in prefixing
all global symbols.
Stephen Hemminger (3):
net/ntnic: rename nt_log_ types
net/ntnic: rename hwlock
net/ntnic: make flow_lock local
drivers/net/ntnic/include/create_elements.h | 2 --
.../ntnic/include/stream_binary_flow_api.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/ntnic/ntlog/ntlog.h | 16 +++++++-------
drivers/net/ntnic/ntnic_ethdev.c | 22 +++++++++----------
drivers/net/ntnic/ntnic_filter/ntnic_filter.c | 10 ++++-----
5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20250929/1f0f8143/attachment.htm>
More information about the dev
mailing list