Issue with patch application (Depends-on ignored) - pw169600-169609

Prashant Gupta prashant.gupta_3 at nxp.com
Wed Oct 7 11:17:02 CEST 2026


Hi,

Can Somebody please guide for this case?
Thanks in advance !

Regards,
Prashant


NXP Confidential
-----Original Message-----
From: Prashant Gupta
Sent: 16 September 2026 14:57
To: 'dpdklab at iol.unh.edu' <dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>; 'aconole at redhat.com' <aconole at redhat.com>; 'david.marchand at redhat.com' <david.marchand at redhat.com>; 'stephen at networkplumber.org' <stephen at networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
Subject: Issue with patch application (Depends-on ignored) - pw169600-169609

Hi UNH-IOL CI Team,

I received an apply patch failure warning for patch set 169600-169609 (Series 39292). (https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2026-September/1044522.html)

The build failed because it tried to apply directly to origin/main, resulting in a conflict inside drivers/dma/dpaa2/dpaa2_qdma.c. However, this series strictly depends on my previous series 39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser features"), which contains the base infrastructure changes.

I included a "Depends-on" tag in the cover letter to handle this sequence, but the CI bot seems to have missed or skipped it. (https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20260915120208.4185877-1-prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com/)
(Depends-on: series-39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser features"))


Could you please help me check if there was a parsing issue with the tag layout, or if I need to format the dependency tag differently so the lab bots can chain these series automatically?

Regards,
Prashant Gupta



More information about the dev mailing list