Issue with patch application (Depends-on ignored) - pw169600-169609

[Aaron Conole]

Prashant Gupta <prashant.gupta_3 at nxp.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Can Somebody please guide for this case?
> Thanks in advance !

Depends on was merged in upstream patchwork some time ago, but the
release hasn't come out with it yet.  IOL Depends-on support relies on
this feature being provided by patchwork.

> Regards,
> Prashant
>
>
> NXP Confidential
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prashant Gupta
> Sent: 16 September 2026 14:57
> To: 'dpdklab at iol.unh.edu' <dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>; 'aconole at redhat.com'
> <aconole at redhat.com>; 'david.marchand at redhat.com'
> <david.marchand at redhat.com>; 'stephen at networkplumber.org'
> <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
> Subject: Issue with patch application (Depends-on ignored) - pw169600-169609
>
> Hi UNH-IOL CI Team,
>
> I received an apply patch failure warning for patch set 169600-169609
> (Series
> 39292). (https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2026-September/1044522.html)
>
> The build failed because it tried to apply directly to origin/main,
> resulting in a conflict inside
> drivers/dma/dpaa2/dpaa2_qdma.c. However, this series strictly depends
> on my previous series 39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser
> features"), which contains the base infrastructure changes.
>
> I included a "Depends-on" tag in the cover letter to handle this
> sequence, but the CI bot seems to have missed or skipped
> it. (https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20260915120208.4185877-1-prashant.gupta_3@nxp.com/)
> (Depends-on: series-39291 ("net/dpaa2: flow, meter and parser features"))
>
>
> Could you please help me check if there was a parsing issue with the
> tag layout, or if I need to format the dependency tag differently so
> the lab bots can chain these series automatically?
>
> Regards,
> Prashant Gupta