[dpdk-users] Unregistered mempool in secondary

Tom Barbette barbette at kth.se
Thu Dec 6 18:27:58 CET 2018

> except for the fact that you shouldn't run your secondary process with the same coremask as primary (it will lead to mempool cache corruption, among other things).

If I don't touch any packet on the primary, this shouldn't cause any problem, right? We want to use all of the CPU cores for processing. The primary is only a controller.


More information about the users mailing list