[dpdk-ci] [dpdk-marketing] Results are now public

[Jill Lovato]

Agree on the draft - thank you, Jeremy, for putting this together!

I haven't seen any photos of the lab - can someone point me in the right
direction, or perhaps snap and few and share on this thread? I can get this
posted to the DPDK site as early as tomorrow (Friday) morning.

Many thanks,
Jill

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:13 PM O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com>
wrote:

> This looks good to me too. Some pictures would be nice, perhaps a snapshot
> of the dashboard some of the hardware in the lab. It would be good to get
> this posted on dpdk.org, and send a note to announce at dpdk.org to let
> people know about it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas at monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:17 PM
> > To: Jeremy Plsek <jplsek at iol.unh.edu>
> > Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> > <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; ci at dpdk.org; marketing at dpdk.org; Lincoln
> > Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>; Patrick MacArthur <pmacarth at iol.unh.edu>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-marketing] [dpdk-ci] Results are now public
> >
> > Looks great!
> > I think adding pictures would be nice for the blog.
> > Thank you
> >
> > 14/11/2018 22:07, Jeremy Plsek:
> > > With help from Lincoln and Patrick, below is an initial draft of the
> > blog post.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > DPDK Community Lab Publishes Relative Performance Testing Results
> > >
> > > The DPDK Community Lab is an open, independent testing resource for
> > > the DPDK project. Its purpose is to perform automated testing on
> > > incoming patch submissions, to ensure the performance and quality of
> > > DPDK is maintained. Participation in the lab is open to all DPDK
> > > project participants.
> > >
> > > For some time now, the DPDK Community Lab has been gathering
> > > performance deltas using the single-core packet I/O layer 2 throughput
> > > test from DTS for each patch series submitted to DPDK compared to the
> > > master branch. We are pleased to announce that the Lab has recently
> > > been allowed to make these results public. These results are also now
> > > published to Patchwork as they are automatically generated. These
> > > results currently contain Mellanox and Intel devices, and the lab is
> > > able to support hardware from any DPDK participants wishing to support
> > > these testing efforts.
> > >
> > > To view these results, you can go to DPDK Community Lab Dashboard via
> > > the following link: https://lab.dpdk.org. The dashboard lists an
> > > overview of all active patch series and their results. Detailed
> > > results can be viewed by clicking on the patch series. If a patch
> > > fails to merge into master, a build log will show to help identify any
> > > issues. If a patch cleanly merges into master, performance delta
> > > results will show for each participating member.
> > >
> > > The Lab is hosted by the University of New Hampshire InterOperability
> > > Laboratory, as a neutral, third party location. This provides a secure
> > > environment for hosting equipment and generating unbiased results for
> > > all participating vendors. Lab participants, i.e. companies hosting
> > > equipment in the testing, can securely access their equipment through
> > > a VPN, allowing for maintenance and performance tuning, as the DPDK
> > > project progresses.
> > >
> > > The Lab works by polling the Patchwork API. When new patches are
> > > submitted, the CI server merges them with the master branch and
> > > generates a tarball. Each participating system unpacks and installs
> > > the DPDK tarball and then runs the performance testing against this
> > > DPDK build. When all systems have finished testing, the CI gathers the
> > > results into our internal database to be shown on the Dashboard, and
> > > sends final reports to Patchwork to show up on the submitted patch.
> > > This allows patch submitters to utilize Patchwork to view their
> > > individual results, while also allowing anyone to quickly see an
> > > overview of results on the Dashboard. The system provides maintainers
> > > with positive confirmation of the stability and performance of the
> > > overall project.
> > >
> > > In the future, we plan to open the Lab to more testing scenarios, such
> > > as performance testing of other features, beyond single-core packet
> > > I/O layer 2 throughput, and possibly running Unit Tests for DPDK.
> > > Additional features will be added to the Dashboard, such as showing
> > > graphs of the performance changes of master over time.
> > >
> > > If your company would like to be involved, email the Continuous
> > > Integration group at ci at dpdk.org and dpdklab at iol.unh.edu.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM Jeremy Plsek <jplsek at iol.unh.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I can try to get it done later today, but I expect it to be more
> > likely done on Monday.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 9:08 AM O'Driscoll, Tim
> > <tim.odriscoll at intel.com wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas at monjalon.net]
> > > >> > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 2:02 PM
> > > >> > To: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll at intel.com>
> > > >> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Jeremy Plsek
> > > >> > <jplsek at iol.unh.edu>; ci at dpdk.org; marketing at dpdk.org
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-marketing] [dpdk-ci] Results are now public
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 09/11/2018 14:58, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> > > >> > > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > >> > > > 08/11/2018 14:01, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > >> > > > > On 11/7/2018 7:30 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > 06/11/2018 16:33, Jeremy Plsek:
> > > >> > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > >> > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > >> This is just an update that all detailed results are now
> > > >> > public.
> > > >> > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > >> If there is anything out of place, feel free to let me
> > know!
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > It is really nice!
> > > >> > > > > > Thank you
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Should we announce this in 'announce' or 'dev' mail lists?
> > Many
> > > >> > people
> > > >> > > > not aware
> > > >> > > > > of this.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It deserves an announce.
> > > >> > > > And even a blog post I guess.
> > > >> > > > +Cc marketing team
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Agreed. I can do a quick post to announce at dpdk.org. I believe
> > Jeremy
> > > >> > is working on a blog post which can provide more detail.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Should we wait to have a blog post and reference it in the
> > announce?
> > > >>
> > > >> Good question. I think it depends how long the blog will take. If
> > we can do it fairly quickly, then this is a good idea. If it's going to
> > take a few weeks, then we should announce it now.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeremy: When do you think the blog will be ready?
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy Plsek
> > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
*Jill Lovato*
Senior PR Manager
The Linux Foundation
jlovato at linuxfoundation.org
Skype: jill.lovato1
Phone: +1.503.703.8268
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20181115/0a67f6a5/attachment.html>