[dpdk-dev] Making rte_eal_pci_probe() in rte_eal_init() optional?
Thomas Monjalon
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Tue Nov 17 16:46:54 CET 2015
2015-11-17 08:56, Roger B. Melton:
> Hi David, in-line -Roger
>
> On 11/16/15 4:46 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello Roger,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Roger B. Melton <rmelton at cisco.com
> > <mailto:rmelton at cisco.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I like the "-b all" and "-w none" idea, but I think it might be
> > complicated to implement it the way we would need it to work. The
> > existing -b and -w options persist for the duration of the
> > application, and we would need the "-b all"/"-w none" to persists
> > only through rte_eal_init() time. Otherwise our attempt to to
> > attach a device at a later time would be blocked by the option.
> >
> > I agree, the black/white lists should only apply to initial scan.
> > I forgot about this problem ...
> > I had started some cleanup in the pci scan / attach code but this is
> > too late for 2.2, I will post this in the next merge window.
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't it be simpler to have an option to disable the
> > rte_eal_init() time the probe. Would that address the issue with
> > VFIO, prevent automatically attaching to devices while permitting
> > on demand attach?
> >
> >
> > I suppose we can do this yes (I think Thomas once proposed off-list an
> > option like --no-pci-scan).
> > Do you think you can send a patch ?
>
> What about --no-pci-init-probe? I know it's long, but it is more
> descriptive of it's purpose to disable only the init time pci probe.
Why not a "-b all"?
Making it work would also solve the case where you to scan only part of
the devices and initialize the blacklisted ones later.
More information about the dev
mailing list