[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add function to check if primary proc alive

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Tue Jan 26 20:13:11 CET 2016

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:44:59AM +0000, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > From: Richardson, Bruce
> > The details of what the config file is should largely be hidden from the user
> > IMHO.
> Agreed, however hiding it totally removes the flexibility of waiting for a primary
> that is starting with --file-prefix (aka: in a non-default location). Imposing
> a limit on only monitoring primary procs in the default location seems wrong.

But the secondary also needs the same prefix. Is that prefix not accessible by
this function to be used?


More information about the dev mailing list