[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add function to check if primary proc alive
Van Haaren, Harry
harry.van.haaren at intel.com
Wed Jan 27 11:35:50 CET 2016
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> > Agreed, however hiding it totally removes the flexibility of waiting for a primary
> > that is starting with --file-prefix (aka: in a non-default location). Imposing
> > a limit on only monitoring primary procs in the default location seems wrong.
> But the secondary also needs the same prefix. Is that prefix not accessible by
> this function to be used?
The issue is that the EAL parsing code is performed during rte_init(), which
is exactly what this function tries to avoid - initializing EAL before a primary
I looked at changing the EAL parsing to come before rte_init(), and considered
adding a minimal parser for --file-prefix. Both routes seem a bad solution,
either for complexity or code-duplication.
v2 of this patch posted to list:
More information about the dev