[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rename folder to library name

[Bruce Richardson]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 03/04/2018 12:57, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 03/04/2018 11:28, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > > Library folder name and output library name are same except a few flaws
> > > > including librte_ether.
> > > > 
> > > > This library is network device abstraction layer, the name "ethdev" fits
> > > > better than "ether", and library & header files already named as ethdev.
> > > > 
> > > > Also there is a rte_ether.h in the net library which can cause confusion.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Not sure if the we are ready for this change J
> > > > 
> > > > This is one the issues that the hassle of the change doesn't worth the
> > > > benefit and you may prefer to live with the flaw.
> > > > 
> > > > Also a concern is this breaks the git history.
> > > 
> > > Yes it breaks the git history.
> > > I am a big user of gitk. Do you know how to follow the history after rename
> > > with gitk?
> > > 
> > > I think it is a good change but I would like to be sure it will not
> > > bother us every day.
> > > 
> > For those of use with even slight OCD, having it the way it is bothers us
> > every day! :-)
> > I view this as something that we really should do some day - it's just
> > broken the way the way it is right now - and so the sooner we take the hit
> > and fix it, the better.
> 
> Yes
> 
> > If you do need to find the history of the file, would git blame work well
> > enough for you?
> 
> No, blame is not enough, but it does not matter.
> 
> When should we do this rename? 18.05-rc1?
> 
If we are going to do this rename, I don't see why we should wait.

/Bruce