[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: rename folder to library name

[Wiles, Keith]

> On Apr 3, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 03/04/2018 12:57, Bruce Richardson:
>>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 03/04/2018 11:28, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>>> Library folder name and output library name are same except a few flaws
>>>>> including librte_ether.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This library is network device abstraction layer, the name "ethdev" fits
>>>>> better than "ether", and library & header files already named as ethdev.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also there is a rte_ether.h in the net library which can cause confusion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Not sure if the we are ready for this change J
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is one the issues that the hassle of the change doesn't worth the
>>>>> benefit and you may prefer to live with the flaw.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also a concern is this breaks the git history.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes it breaks the git history.
>>>> I am a big user of gitk. Do you know how to follow the history after rename
>>>> with gitk?
>>>> 
>>>> I think it is a good change but I would like to be sure it will not
>>>> bother us every day.
>>>> 
>>> For those of use with even slight OCD, having it the way it is bothers us
>>> every day! :-)
>>> I view this as something that we really should do some day - it's just
>>> broken the way the way it is right now - and so the sooner we take the hit
>>> and fix it, the better.
>> 
>> Yes
>> 
>>> If you do need to find the history of the file, would git blame work well
>>> enough for you?
>> 
>> No, blame is not enough, but it does not matter.
>> 
>> When should we do this rename? 18.05-rc1?
>> 
> If we are going to do this rename, I don't see why we should wait.

+1 make the change ASAP IMO.
> 
> /Bruce

Regards,
Keith