[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples: remove Rx checksum offload

[Jerin Jacob]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:00:02 +0000
> From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>, Jerin Jacob
>  <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> CC: "dev at dpdk.org" <dev at dpdk.org>, "Yigit, Ferruh"
>  <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>, "shahafs at mellanox.com" <shahafs at mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples: remove Rx checksum offload
> 
> External Email
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas at monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:51 AM
> > To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; shahafs at mellanox.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples: remove Rx checksum offload
> >
> > 30/07/2018 11:35, Jerin Jacob:
> > > From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > As of now, application does not check PKT_RX_*_CKSUM_* flags per
> > > > > packet, so it does not matter DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM enabled or not.
> > > > >
> > > > > Removing DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM offload so that driver can save a few
> > > > > cycles if possible.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I'd move in other direction: keep RX checksum offload and add
> > > > checks inside sample apps to handle (drop) packets with invalid checksum.
> > >
> > > OK. Till someones add the DROP logic in application, Can we take
> > > this patch? Because there is no point in enabling DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM
> > > without DROP or any meaning full action in application.
> 
> Probably, but at least it gives users a right estimation how long the proper
> RX/TX routine would take.

For estimation, application can add any flag they want in local setup.
It does not need to be upstream with out feature complete.

> From other side what the point to disable these flags now, if we know that

At least nicvf Rx routines are crafted based DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM
flags. If driver Rx routine crafted such case it will be useful.

> we are doing wrong thing and will have to re-enable them again in future?

But it is not correct now either. Right?

> 
> >
> > If there is no patch sent to use this offload on August 1st,
> > then I will apply this patch to remove the offload request.
> >
> 
> Isn't it too late to do such things right now?
> We are in RC3 stage and doesn't look like a critical issue.

Yes. We can add it when have we proper fix. Currently, it signaling a wrong
interpretation to application.


> Konstantin
> 
>