[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/meson: hash lf test moved to dpdk perf testsuite

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

<snip>

> >Subject: [PATCH 2/2] test/meson: hash lf test moved to dpdk perf
> >testsuite
> >
> >From: Amit Gupta <agupta3 at marvell.com>
> >
> >hash_readwrite_lf test always getting TIMEOUT as required time to
> >finish this test was much longer compare to time required for fast
> >tests(10s). Hence, the test is being moved to perf test category for
> >its execution to complete.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <agupta3 at marvell.com>
> >---
> > app/test/meson.build | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build index
> >94fd9f8..34141c5 100644
> >--- a/app/test/meson.build
> >+++ b/app/test/meson.build
> >@@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ fast_test_names = [
> >         'eventdev_common_autotest',
> >         'fbarray_autotest',
> >         'hash_readwrite_func_autotest',
> >-        'hash_readwrite_lf_autotest',
> >         'ipsec_autotest',
> >         'kni_autotest',
> >         'kvargs_autotest',
> >@@ -263,6 +262,7 @@ perf_test_names = [
> >         'stack_lf_perf_autotest',
> >         'rand_perf_autotest',
> >         'hash_readwrite_perf_autotest',
> >+        'hash_readwrite_lf_autotest',
> > ]
> >
> > driver_test_names = [
> >--
> >1.8.3.1
>  [Wang, Yipeng]
> I believe the lf_autotest includes functional test as well which is critical for
> testing the lock free implementation on non-TSO machine.
> Do you think it is possible to also separate this test?
> I also include the ARM folks for opinions.
Thanks Yipeng. We combined the functional testing with performance testing. So, it is all performance tests. From that perspective, I suggest changing 'hash_readwrite_lf_autotest' to 'hash_readwrite_lf_perf_autotest'.

> 
> Thanks!
> Yipeng