[dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 3/12/2020

[oulijun]

在 2020/12/7 20:31, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 12/7/2020 11:54 AM, oulijun wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2020/12/3 19:51, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
>>> Meeting minutes of 3 December 2020
>>> ----------------------------------
>>>
>>> Agenda:
>>> * Release Dates
>>> * 20.11 retrospective
>>> * LTS
>>> * OvS
>>> * Opens
>>>
>>> Participants:
>>> * Arm
>>> * Debian/Microsoft
>>> * Intel
>>> * Nvidia
>>> * NXP
>>> * Red Hat
>>>
>>>
>>> Release Dates
>>> -------------
>>>
>>> * v20.11 is released on Friday, 27 November 2020
>>>    * https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-November/193684.html
>>>    * https://core.dpdk.org/download/
>>>    * https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.html
>>>
>>>    * This was the biggest ever DPDK release, thanks to everyone who 
>>> contributed.
>>>
>>> * v21.02 dates
>>>    * Proposal/V1:    Sunday, 20 December 2020
>>>    * -rc1:           Friday, 15 January 2021
>>>    * Release:        Friday, 5 February 2021
>>>
>>>    * Please send roadmaps, preferably before beginning of the release
>>>      * Thanks to NTT for sending roadmap
>>>
>> Hi， Ferruh Yigit
>>    We plan to send the roadmap, but we're not sure what it requires? 
>> Is it per vendor or per PMD vendor? What should he contain?
>>
> 
> There is no strict formatting for it, the intention is to document the 
> work planned for the coming release, it is sent per vendor mostly. 
> Following are the past a few ones you can check as samples:
> 
> arm: 
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/DBAPR08MB58147BA5F6A1D90B702592C498240@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com/ 
> 
> broadcom: 
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CACZ4nhvDnB49YK_4SMH=BDAoRntgXxyW4kjpcpdqwHuGpwwOGg@mail.gmail.com/ 
> 
> nvidia: 
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/DM5PR12MB2406E0A8CC7C6E884B770B02CD560@DM5PR12MB2406.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/ 
> 
> marvell: 
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/BYAPR18MB2424F954434930AEF34CBD0AC8590@BYAPR18MB2424.namprd18.prod.outlook.com/ 
> 
> intel: 
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200612135804.3781756-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com/
> 
> 
Hi,
   Firstly, thank you for your response. As a new PMD developer and 
maintainer, I am  probably understand.
   In addition, I would like to know that if we do not develop and push 
our features in a timely manner according to the roadmap, this will not 
affect you and others, or we develop and push redundant features in the 
roadmap.

Thanks
Lijun Ou
>> Thanks
>> Lijun Ou
>>>
>>> 20.11 retrospective
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> (I tried to summarize as best as I can, please free to correct/add 
>>> when needed)
>>>
>>> * What went well
>>>    * Managed to get out this very big release on time
>>>    * Was more precise with dates
>>>    * Expectations on features were more clear in this release
>>>    * Good co-working between maintainers
>>>      * Communication was better, project become more resilient
>>>    * Akhil commented last minute stress was less
>>>    * Major gcc distribution didn't cause disruption this time
>>>    * LTS is doing good job overall
>>>      * Thanks to Luca and Kevin for their work there
>>>
>>> * Things to improve
>>>    * next-net is busy, %60+ of the commits coming from next-net,
>>>      would be good to get more help, options to improve
>>>      * Add a co-maintainer in that level
>>>        * Andrew (backup maintainer) is great candidate if he can 
>>> spare time
>>>          He is already helping on reviews
>>>        * He already covered during release when Ferruh is on holiday
>>>      * Testpmd maintainership is not working fine, find maintainers 
>>> for it
>>>      * Should we add more vendor trees?
>>>        * Huawei is contributing more, should it have a vendor sub-tree?
>>>          * Huawei is being good citizen mostly
>>>    * CI can be improved
>>>    * Top level Thomas/David may felt the last minute stress more this 
>>> time
>>>      * Pachwork update by Jerin, to add reviewer column may help
>>>        * This seems not exactly matching patchwork intention of using 
>>> delegate
>>>          field
>>>          * Need to work on how to upstream this improvement
>>>      * It is causing more problem when expectation is not clear from 
>>> vendors
>>>    * Security issues
>>>      * They didn't work very well, the busy release is affecting it
>>>        * Good thing is there is a well defined process, needs 
>>> resource to execute
>>>        * Can help to allocate separate resource for it
>>>          * A technical project manager can do it, doesn't have to be 
>>> developer
>>>
>>>
>>> LTS
>>> ---
>>>
>>> * v19.11.6-rc1 is out, please test
>>>    * 
>>> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20201203093856.299103-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com/ 
>>>
>>>    * Target release date is 17 December
>>>
>>> * v18.11.10 work is going on
>>>    * waiting for backports, request emails sent
>>>    * -rc1 is planned before holidays
>>>
>>>
>>> OvS
>>> ---
>>>
>>> * Second version of patch to switch DPDK 20.11 is sent, please review
>>>
>>>
>>> Opens
>>> -----
>>>
>>> * Asaf shared a draft release process documentation
>>>    * It will be sent as documentation patch for community review,
>>>      after initial review
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> DPDK Release Status Meetings
>>> ============================
>>>
>>> The DPDK Release Status Meeting is intended for DPDK Committers to 
>>> discuss the
>>> status of the master tree and sub-trees, and for project managers to 
>>> track
>>> progress or milestone dates.
>>>
>>> The meeting occurs on every Thursdays at 8:30 UTC. on 
>>> https://meet.jit.si/DPDK
>>>
>>> If you wish to attend just send an email to
>>> "John McNamara <john.mcnamara at intel.com>" for the invite.
>>> .
>>>
> 
> .
>