[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] add ABI checks
fiona.trahe at intel.com
Tue Feb 4 11:10:42 CET 2020
And not used for sizing > >
> > There a c) though right.
> > We could work around the issue by api versioning rte_cryptodev_info_get() and friends.
> It has a lot of friends, but it sounds like the right approach.
> Is someone looking into this?
[Fiona] Yes. But not clear yet if can be done by tomorrow.
But even if feasible, that only works around the current issue.
There is a bigger issue to be decided here -
Should we be removing LIST_END/MAX values from all enums in 20.11?
Or defining through API comment that they should only be used as a range boundary and
NOT to size an array. And so having a fixed value is not part of the API contract.
More information about the dev