[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/15] examples/rxtx_callbacks: switch to dynamic mbuf field

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Oct 26 11:43:30 CET 2020


On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> The example used the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
>
> Note: RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME is an existing mbuf field name.

I am a bit lost.
How is this going to work as the mbuf timestamp field is used in this
example too?


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list