[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/15] examples/rxtx_callbacks: switch to dynamic mbuf field

[Thomas Monjalon]

26/10/2020 11:43, David Marchand:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > The example used the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
> >
> > Note: RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME is an existing mbuf field name.
> 
> I am a bit lost.
> How is this going to work as the mbuf timestamp field is used in this
> example too?

Oh, you're right!
I will change the naming scheme to a custom "TSC" field.