[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/15] examples/rxtx_callbacks: switch to dynamic mbuf field

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:33:14 +0100
Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:

> 26/10/2020 11:43, David Marchand:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:  
> > >
> > > The example used the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> > > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
> > >
> > > Note: RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME is an existing mbuf field name.  
> > 
> > I am a bit lost.
> > How is this going to work as the mbuf timestamp field is used in this
> > example too?  
> 
> Oh, you're right!
> I will change the naming scheme to a custom "TSC" field.
> 
> 

Since timestamp is still there why doesn't the example just use that?