[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] UNH-IOL ABI Failures
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Apr 20 17:37:19 CEST 2021
20/04/2021 17:30, Brandon Lo:
> Hi all,
>
> We have noticed some failures occurring repeatedly in our CI system
> regarding the ABI test.
>
> I looked into the failures and saw that there were some failures
> caused by a clock skew issue on the ARM ABI test.
> Those failures have been rerun and the report will be resent to
> patchworks for the updated result.
>
> However, the earlier test runs seem to report an actual failure:
>
> "1 function with some indirect sub-type change:
>
> [C]'function rte_security_session*
> rte_security_session_create(rte_security_ctx*,
> rte_security_session_conf*, rte_mempool*, rte_mempool*)' at
> rte_security.c:43:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
> parameter 2 of type 'rte_security_session_conf*' has sub-type changes:
> in pointed to type 'struct rte_security_session_conf' at
> rte_security.h:366:1:
> type size hasn't changed
> 1 data member change:
> type of 'rte_crypto_sym_xform*
> rte_security_session_conf::crypto_xform' changed:
> in pointed to type 'struct rte_crypto_sym_xform' at
> rte_crypto_sym.h:575:1:
> type size hasn't changed
> 1 data member changes (1 filtered):
>
> Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff --suppr
> dpdk/devtools/libabigail.abignore --no-added-syms --headers-dir1
> reference/usr/local/include --headers-dir2 build/usr/local/include
> reference/dump/librte_security.dump build/dump/librte_security.dump'
>
> ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a review (abidiff flagged
> this as a potential issue)."
>
> Can anyone please confirm that this is a real ABI issue or if this
> requires a change on the UNH-IOL side.
It requires libabigail 1.8 on UNH-IOL side.
More information about the dev
mailing list