[dpdk-dev] RFC enabling dll/dso for dpdk on windows
Tyler Retzlaff
roretzla at linux.microsoft.com
Fri Jul 9 02:16:56 CEST 2021
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 10:39:13PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/07/2021 21:21, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > (2) importing exported data symbols from a dll/dso on windows requires
> > that the symbol be decorated with dllimport. optionally loading
> > performance of dll/dso is also further improved by decorating
> > exported function symbols. [3]
> >
> > for (2) we would propose the introduction and use of two macros to
> > allow decoration of exported data symbols. these macro would be or
> > similarly named __rte_import and __rte_export. of note
>
> That's the same symbol declared in a single place
> which is exported and imported.
> So I don't understand the need for 2 macros.
i may be misinterpreting your reply. you're saying there is no need for
2 because we use .def files?
strictly speaking when exporting C symbols this is true. so yes, we
could introduce only __rte_import and not bother with __rte_export.
is that what you meant?
i don't have any objection to just __rte_import alone but it is
mandatory for data symbols.
More information about the dev
mailing list