[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/6] app/testpmd: dump device capability and Rx domain info

[Xueming(Steven) Li]

On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 11:33 +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/19/21 11:17 AM, Xueming Li wrote:
> > Dump device capability and Rx domain ID if shared Rx queue is supported
> > by device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> 
> LGTM except one minor note:
> 
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> 
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/config.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> > index 9c66329e96e..c0616dcd2fd 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
> > @@ -733,6 +733,7 @@ port_infos_display(portid_t port_id)
> >  	printf("Max segment number per MTU/TSO: %hu\n",
> >  		dev_info.tx_desc_lim.nb_mtu_seg_max);
> >  
> > +	printf("Device capabilities: 0x%"PRIx64"\n", dev_info.dev_capa);
> 
> IMHO, it should be decoded

Thanks for checking this, do you mean decode to readable names?
Then we need a new API rte_eth_dev_capability_name(), it's simple, but
is it ok to add API w/o RFC?

> 
> >  	/* Show switch info only if valid switch domain and port id is set */
> >  	if (dev_info.switch_info.domain_id !=
> >  		RTE_ETH_DEV_SWITCH_DOMAIN_ID_INVALID) {
> > @@ -743,6 +744,9 @@ port_infos_display(portid_t port_id)
> >  			dev_info.switch_info.domain_id);
> >  		printf("Switch Port Id: %u\n",
> >  			dev_info.switch_info.port_id);
> > +		if ((dev_info.dev_capa & RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_RXQ_SHARE) != 0)
> > +			printf("Switch Rx domain: %u\n",
> > +			       dev_info.switch_info.rx_domain);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > 
>