[PATCH v6 26/26] net/spnic: fixes unsafe C style code
Yanling Song
songyl at ramaxel.com
Fri Jan 21 10:40:23 CET 2022
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:28:11 +0000
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:
> On 12/30/2021 6:09 AM, Yanling Song wrote:
> > Use the hardware structure instead of void* as parameter of
> > function to keep the type information
>
> Hi Yanling,
>
> This is a new driver and first patchset for it. Instead of fixing it
> in the set, why not update old patches to introduce them correct at
> first place?
>
Thanks for the guide. Will do it this way in the next version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yanling Song <songyl at ramaxel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_cmdq.c | 14 +--
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_cmdq.h | 6 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hw_cfg.c | 49 ++++------
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hw_cfg.h | 16 ++--
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hw_comm.c | 32 ++++---
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hw_comm.h | 22 ++---
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hwdev.c | 8 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hwif.c | 52 +++++------
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_hwif.h | 22 ++---
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_mgmt.c | 9 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_mgmt.h | 4 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_nic_cfg.c | 110
> > +++++++++++------------ drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_nic_cfg.h |
> > 84 ++++++++--------- drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_nic_event.c | 30
> > +++---- drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_nic_event.h | 10 +--
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_wq.c | 3 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/base/spnic_wq.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/spnic_ethdev.c | 10 +--
> > drivers/net/spnic/spnic_io.c | 34 +++----
> > drivers/net/spnic/spnic_io.h | 10 +--
> > drivers/net/spnic/spnic_rx.c | 4 +-
> > drivers/net/spnic/spnic_tx.c | 4 +-
> > 22 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 283 deletions(-)
>
>
> <...>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list